Creative Critical Reflection Rough Draft 4

Throughout the editing of our extract, our group used multiple editing sources in order to capture the shots accurately to audiences.  In our first submission we used the editing cite iMovie for our titles.  This was an easy way out because iMovie is a very generic editing software not offering any originality.  The titles being imported were also rushed which led to the, "Title Text Here", being shown in our opening credits.  Upon re editing our new extract, we used Davinci Resolve for the title slides which offer more originality and room for less error in having an unwanted credit being shown.  Davinci Resolve was also used as well as Final Cut for our sound in terms of effects and voice overs.  For color filtering and correcting, the software system Adobe Premiere to edit this part of our extract. Our extract needed powerful editing in order for our ideas to be properly displayed to audiences which is why we used so many editing software in order to have an understood meaning of our extract.

In filming, we used Carl's two different cameras, the  Canon 60D and the Canon 80D.  They benefited our extract by making it have better quality which helps make our extract look legitimate.  It was my first time filming on an actual camera rather than an iPhone which gave me a new learning as well.  I was taught how to film on both cameras which means in the future I should be able to adjust filming on a different camera.  In adding sound, we used a Blue Snowball microphone to obtain the accurate sounds that fit our film.  For example, the voice over that appears throughout the film was used from the Blue Snowball Microphone.  The depth of inflection used in the recording would not have been as accurately obtained without using the Blue Snowball Microphone.